Purely analytical thermodynamic models can miss real-world hardware effects such as uneven wetting of the evaporative matrix or airflow non-uniformity. A purely data-driven model, on the other hand, risks fitting patterns that don't respect real physical constraints. The project combines both:
- **First-principles track**: heat and mass-transfer equations governing the evaporative cooling process.
- **ML surrogate track**: Ridge regression models trained on real sensor telemetry to capture behavior the analytical model alone doesn't fully account for.
Wet-Bulb Effectiveness
A standard psychrometric measure of an evaporative cooler's performance:
ε_wb = (T_dry-bulb,in − T_dry-bulb,out) / (T_dry-bulb,in − T_wet-bulb,in)
Surrogate models predict outlet dry-bulb temperature, from which effectiveness is derived and checked against the physical bound 0 ≤ ε_wb ≤ 1.